Sunday, 31 July 2011

Coaxial Cable - cable nails, cat5


People have mentioned you get 50 of these for the price of 100 of a different brand and they are all rg-6 clips so why bother with this, right? Well turns out the philips clips have some advantages.



First, not all RG-6 is the same OD, like the quad foil shield rg-6 heavy duty. It turns out the Philips are more generously sized for larger rg-6 cables.



Also the plastic on the philips is a heavier grade (made with less regrind for those of you who know about injection molding) - all that means is it is less likely to crack



Finally the philips nail is a larger diameter and really grips into whatever you smack it on.



These quality issues make the 50 pack of better clips a good deal for me even when the 100 pack of the the thinner plastic/nail and smaller inside diameter product is also available. Both will do the job, but these won't come undone! Philips SWV2090W/27 Coaxial RG6 Nail-In Clips (50 Pack, White)

First off, these nail-in clips are wonderful; however, it's a shame that I didn't search further otherwise I would have gotten these instead (Cable-Clip White RG6 (100 pieces per bag)).



Pro(s):

- Pretty good quality (plastic and nails didn't break on any of them)

- Easy to use (nails came pre-installed with the plastic, just place and hammer away)



Con(s):

- Price



Recommendation(s)/Suggestion(s):

- If you're placing these outdoor, keep them out of the sun (long term exposure to the sun will cause the plastic to fade and turn brittle)



These really do the job at tucking coaxial cables nicely!

These Nail-In clips are a perfect for securing coax cable against a wall. What I was impressed with, was that the nails come pre-installed in the clips -- making it very easy to bang them into the wall. - Cable Nails - Cat5 - Coax - 50 Ft'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Garmin nvi 3450 4.3-Inch Portable GPS Navigator


Automatic dual-screen orientation

Speed limit indicator

Lane assist with photoReal junction view

Less than 9mm thick

multi-touch glass display with pinch to zoom




Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information



»»»Visit Store NOW...


Best price click here

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 12.1 MP Digital Camera with 4x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.7-Inch LC


Optical Zoom 4x; Extra Optical Zoom 4.9x (4 - 3 / 8M), 6.3x (4 - 3 / 5M), 7.8x

Optical Image Stabilizer-2 MEGA O.I.S. (Off / Auto / Mode1 / Mode2) Photo and Movie modes

Focus Range Display / AF Metering / Focus - Normal / Macro, Zoom Macro, Quick AF (Always On) / AF Assist Lamp

ISO Sensitivity Auto / 80 / 100 / 200 / 400 / 800 / 1600 / High Sensitivity (ISO 1600-6400)

White Balance Auto / Daylight / Cloudy / Shade / Halogen / White Set (Selectable at Portrait, Soft Skin, Transform



This review is from: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 12.1 MP Digital Camera with 4x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.7-Inch LCD (Red)I had a Konica Minolta Dimage X60 for the longest time and wanted a replacement now, my old camera was 5 years old and became slower and slower.I tried 3 other cameras (Samsung, Nikon and Olympus) but had to send them back.... but the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 (I didn't want the FP-3, I don't like touchscreens) is beyond my expectations.The battery life is outstanding, I love that you don't have the lens coming out while zooming (was used to the inside lens from the Konica), the colors are really natural, the screen is crystal clear, the operation is so easy, the camera is very light and compact.... what else can I say :)I'm finally satisfied!!!!Oh there is one small con.... the camera takes HD videos (my old camera only took VGA) but you have to zoom in or focus before you start recording... after you hit the recording button you can't zoom in anymore. However the quality of the video is awesome!! 4 stars from me... I'm really happy... if I could zoom in while taking a video I would give the camera 5 stars. However I did some research and not many cameras can zoom in while taking HD videos, so all good ;)Battery life and picture quality is what matters most to me!!!

This review is from: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 12.1 MP Digital Camera with 4x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.7-Inch LCD (Red)We intially purchased this camera for our kids but have taken it over. The lithium battery makes a great difference in the camera always being ready to shoot. The on/off design is very practical as well. This model recieved a very good rating from Consumer Reports. Our photos clarity - both flash & daylight- have been better than anticipated. Only drawback for the adults is that there is no 'viewer' but the screen is good sized. Please note that the 'red' camera colour has a distinct pinkish hue.

This review is from: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 12.1 MP Digital Camera with 4x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.7-Inch LCD (Red)I bought this camera as a present for my wife. I tested it and compared it to other digital cameras. Then, I returned this camera, and bought my wife the Canon SD1300 IS instead because it is clearly a superior camera that costs only a little more.I compared the Panasonic Lumix DMC FP1, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1, the Canon Powershot S500 (my 8 year old malfunctioning digital camera), the Canon Powershot SD1300 IS, and my Canon Rebel T1i (my dSLR...an unfair comparison, but I wanted benchmark for these cheaper cameras). I had always liked my old Canon S500, but I read some reviews on Amazon and other websites, and it seemed like the Panasonic cameras were really good cameras at a great price.For me, the number one consideration is picture quality. If you don't have that, you don't have anything. Things that detract from picture quality are poor signal to noise, lack of sharpness, poor color rendering, and various artifacts. Therefore, I tested these 5 cameras under different conditions. I copied the jpegs onto my computer, and I looked at the images at 100% to see how good they really are. The most revealing results were shot under medium light indoors. This is very important if you ever want to take any indoor pictures. The results were as follows (from best to worst):1) Canon T1i (1 year old, about $700), excellent pictures even without flash2) Canon SD1300 IS (brand new, about $110), very good photos for a compact digital camera3) Canon S500 (8 years old, $400 new, not performing as well as it used to)Surprisingly, although this is not shooting as well as it used to 8 years ago, it still outperformed the Panasonic cameras.4) Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 (brand new, about $90), this had very poor signal to noise and moderately poor color rendering.5) Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 (brand new, about $80), this camera performed significantly worse even than the FH1. The non extending lens is nifty but yields poor photos.In addition to this, I found that the Canon was easier to operate and easier to take videos.Nowadays, compact digital cameras are quite inexpensive. Do yourself a favor and buy a high quality camera. More megapixels does NOT necessarily mean better pictures, and having a large optical zoom can sometimes compromise lens quality and thus picture quality. Also, consider sensor size: this can make a big difference in picture quality, th...




Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information



»»»Visit Store NOW...


Best price click here

Nikon D300s 12.3MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II Lens


12.3-megapixel CMOS image sensor for high resolution, low-noise images3

Includes AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II lens

Nikon EXPEED image processing; D-Movie HD Video for cinematic 24 fps, 720p HD movie clips

3-inch Super-density 920,000-dot VGA LCD; one-button Live View

Capture images to SD/SDHC memory cards (not included)



This review is from: Nikon D300s 12.3MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II LensI've had the E-620 for a few weeks now and am quite pleased. Other options I considered were the Nikon D5000, Canon T1i & XSi, Panasonic G1, Sony A300 & A350, and Pentax K200D & K20D. Some comments with comparison notes:1) SIZE & WEIGHT -- There's no point in having a camera that is so bulky that it doesn't get much use. Only the Panasonic G1 is smaller than the E-620 but not by much. There is a more dramatic difference in the size of the lenses, with Olympus being much smaller than all but Panasonic. Makes for a very compact outfit. For anyone used to the size of film SLRs, the E-620 is very similar. My wife also found it the most comfortable for her to hold.2) BUILD QUALITY & HANDLING -- Very impressed with Olympus here. Solid, dense and with lots of sensibly placed buttons for direct access to settings. The other cameras had a less solid, plasticy feel, and their larger grips still weren't large enough for a comfortable pistol grip with my average size hands. The Sonys, in particular, had awkward button placement. The E-620 has a different style of grip where you hold the camera in the same way as old film SLRs, and is more appropriate to such a small camera. I carry the camera comfortably in my *left* hand, grasping the body and lens barrel with my fingers on the zoom ring; this frees my right hand from having to support the camera while working controls, and leaves my good hand open (I'm a righty).3) LENSES -- The kit zooms from Olympus are reputed to be of higher quality than the others, as well as being more compact. So far I have been very impressed. I didn't want to buy a camera only to feel the kit lenses needed replacing; I'd rather spend on lenses that offer new capabilities, like fast primes or dedicated macro lenses. For anyone interesting in using legacy manual focus lenses, inexpensive adapters are available to attach virtually any MF SLR lens to Olympus bodies; used lenses can be quite inexpensive on eBay. Panasonic is limited by a very small range of lenses. For a two lens kit, the E-620 was the cheapest option.4) IMAGE QUALITY -- I wanted to spend my time taking pictures, not fiddling with them in post-processing; Olympus has the best out-of-camera JPGs of the bunch (Canon and Pentax, in particular, fall short here). Although the smaller Olympus sensors are reputed to be a bit noisier, what noise there is is primarily luminance noise, giving images a film-like grain, rather than the colored blotches of chroma noise. I've found noise very well controlled through ISO1000, even with noise reduction set to LOW. For printing up through 8x10 and monitor display, I don't think noise is a concern up through ISO1600 (certainly with noise reduction set to standard). One caveat: be sure to keep gradation set at NORMAL (the default), not AUTO, unless you really need it; using AUTO gradation will noticeably increase noise.5) IN BODY STABILIZATION -- I prefer in body stabilization to lens-based stabilization for two reasons: in body works with all lenses, and lenses can be more compact. You only carry one body but you are likely to carry multiple lenses, so it pays to keep them small.6) LIVE VIEW & LCD -- Olympus has the best live view implementation (maybe tied with Sony) with quite quick autofocus. This is very important if you want anyone, e.g. my wife or random bystanders, who's used to compact cameras to use your SLR for snapshots or the like. The tilt & swivel LCD is very handy and seemed more natural than Nikon or Sony's implementations.Overall, I found the E-620 to be the best value for a two lens kit.Here are a few notes on the other cameras I considered:Nikon D5000 -- Good build & handling, but a bit bulky. Live view isn't great. Much more expensive for a two lens kit than the Olympus.Canon T1i -- Not impressed by the build quality, felt plasticy. Not comfortable for me to hold. Out of camera JPGs not so good. Inferior kit lenses. Much more expensive for a two lens kit than the Olympus.Canon XSi -- Not impressed by the build quality, felt plasticy. Not comfortable for me to hold. Out of camera JPGs not so good. Bulkier than the Olympus. Inferior kit lenses.Panasonic G1 -- Limited lens selection; will take legacy MF lenses but doesn't offer image stabilization with them since it isn't in the body. Plasticy. Not much smaller than the Olympus. More expensive than Olympus for a two lens kit.Sony A300 & A350 -- Hated the button placement--ruled them out on that alone. Live view is very good though.Pentax K...




Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information



»»»Visit Store NOW...


Best price click here

Kodak Digital, 8" digital frame (Catalog Category: Cameras & Frames / Digital Picture Frames)





Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information



»»»Visit Store NOW...


Best price click here

Kodak Digital, 8" digital frame (Catalog Category: Cameras & Frames / Digital Picture Frames)





Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information



»»»Visit Store NOW...


Best price click here

New Casio Mns G-Shock Atomic Solar Stainless Steel Bracelet Rated 660 Feet Mineral Crystal


Mns G-Shock Atomic Solar.

Style: Solar; Size: Mens.

Attachment: Stainless Steel Bracelet; Rated: 660 Feet (200 m).

Crystal: Mineral Crystal.

Movement: Solar Powered Quartz Movement.

Product Details

Shipping Weight: 3 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)

ASIN: B005NAI78O

Date first available at Amazon.com: September 7, 2011

 Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?




Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information



»»»Visit Store NOW...


Best price click here